A Question of Exceptional: Giftedness and Cultural Bias

Originally posted on March 24, 2026

Walking through the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center, the word exceptional kept arriving uninvited.

The pottery — technically astonishing, functionally precise, artistically alive. The runners who carried diplomatic messages across vast distances speaking multiple languages between nations. The architectural ingenuity. The oral traditions, stories, and knowledge transmitted intact across centuries.

Exceptional, I kept thinking. Exceptional, exceptional. What an exceptional culture.

And then: by whose measure?

This is not a critique of Pueblo culture, nor a claim to understand it from the outside. It is an astounding, living civilization that speaks entirely for itself. But my general impression is that within these nineteen living nations, none of this may have registered as exceptional at all. It may have simply been what people did. What was expected. What a community transmitted to its children because these were the things worth knowing — the capacities worth cultivating, the ways of being human that mattered here.

Walking out into the New Mexico sun, the unsettling question wasn't about them. It was about the lens itself — built here, in this culture, measuring what this culture decided to value. And how many times it has looked at something extraordinary and simply not had the vocabulary to see it.

Field Notes is an independent research project — the work of a clinician who found the existing framework for understanding giftedness and exceptionality insufficient — and went looking for better answers in the wild. Art, science, culture, history. Not to replace clinical tools like IQ testing, but to build a more honest account of what those tools measure — and what they don't.